Abstract

This study re-examines the origins and development of the Islamic hadith corpus using the combined methods of archaeology, manuscript science, and historiographical analysis.

While the Quran is demonstrably attested in 7th-century manuscripts and inscriptions, the hadith literature lacks any comparable material evidence from that period. The earliest surviving fragments, dated palaeographically to the mid-7th century, appear more than a century after the Quran’s textual stabilisation.

By integrating radiocarbon dating, codicological data, and critical scholarship, from Abbott’s papyrological work to the analyses of Goldziher, Schacht, and Donner, this paper argues that the hadith originated as a post-Quranic literary enterprise serving legal, theological, and political needs of the Abbasid period.

 

The study further examines the fabrication mechanisms that produced conflicting Sunni and Shia traditions and demonstrates that the hadith, far from constituting divine revelation, are historically situated narratives reflecting the empire’s search for authority and coherence. The absence of archaeological corroboration for hadith events or personalities reinforces the conclusion that these texts are ideological reconstructions rather than contemporaneous records.

 

The research, therefore, situates the hadith within the wider phenomenon of late-antique scriptural expansion, comparable to Jewish midrash and Christian apocrypha, revealing Islam’s transformation from an early monotheistic reform movement centred on the Quran to a complex institutional religion founded upon post-revelatory narration.

 

Introduction

The hadith, sayings and actions attributed to the Islamic mythological Prophet Muhammad and his companions occupy a central position in classical Islam. They define law, ritual, and theology and serve as the second source of authority after the Quran. Yet, from a historical-critical standpoint, they are also the least verifiable component of the Islamic textual tradition.

 

No authenticated 7th-century inscription, papyrus, or manuscript contains any identifiable hadith material. This disparity between religious centrality and historical attestation has prompted sustained scholarly scrutiny since the 19th century.

 

The present study asks a simple empirical question: what can archaeology, manuscript evidence, and historiography tell us about the origin and reliability of the hadith?

It adopts a method deliberately restricted to verifiable data, radiocarbon dating, palaeography, codicology, and contemporaneous documentary evidence, eschewing theological justifications and later Islamic apologetic frameworks.

 

By approaching the hadith as historical artefacts rather than sacred texts, we can assess their chronological emergence and sociopolitical function within the formative centuries of Islam.

 

1.1 Context and problem

The Quran is among the best-attested texts of Late Antiquity. Radiocarbon analysis of the Birmingham leaves (Mingana 1572a), the Ṣanʿāʾ palimpsest, and the Tübingen fragments dates their parchment to the mid-7th century CE.

These manuscripts demonstrate that the Quran existed in written form within a generation of the events it narrates. In contrast, no comparable physical evidence anchors the hadith tradition to the same period.

 

The earliest fragments identified as hadith, small papyri from Fustat published by Nabia Abbott (1939, 1957), are palaeographically assigned to the mid-8th century, well after the Umayyad era. Complete compilations such as Mālik ibn Anas’s al-Muwaṭṭaʾ and al-Bukhārī’s al-Ṣaḥīḥ appear between circa 780 and 870 CE, nearly two centuries after the Islamic mythological Muhammad’s death.

 

This chronological gap raises a methodological challenge: if the hadith preserve verbatim memories of a 7th-century prophet, why is there no trace of them in the material record of that century?

The discrepancy compels historians to treat the hadith not as eyewitness testimony but as evolving literature shaped by the intellectual and political environments of the early Abbasid period.

 

1.2 Methodology

The study employs three complementary disciplines:

1. Archaeology and Epigraphy, surveying inscriptions, coins, and artefacts for possible reference to hadith narratives or terminology. The analysis draws on the Corpus Inscriptionum Arabicarum, the early Islamic coin series, and architectural inscriptions such as those of the Dome of the Rock.

2. Manuscript and Papyrological Evidence, examining the physical remains of Quranic and early Arabic writing to determine when hadith texts first appear. Radiocarbon and palaeographic dating are central here, alongside codicological studies by Déroche (2014) and Abbott (1939).

3. Historiography, reviewing the critical scholarship from nineteenth-century Orientalists (Goldziher 1890; Schacht 1950) through modern revisions (Motzki 1991; Donner 2010; Sinai 2017), situates hadith development within the broader context of Near-Eastern literary culture.

 

This tripartite method avoids theological assumptions. It treats the hadith corpus as a post-factum historical artefact, comparable to the Christian apocrypha or Talmudic expansions that retrospectively elaborated earlier scriptures.

 

1.3 Thesis and significance

The central thesis advanced here is that the hadith represent a post-Quranic literary phenomenon that crystallised between the eighth and ninth centuries CE to supply legal and doctrinal authority absent from the Quran itself. Archaeological silence, coupled with the lateness and internal contradictions of the textual witnesses, demonstrates that the hadith cannot reliably transmit seventh-century events. Instead, they reveal the self-definition of the early Muslim community as it evolved into an imperial religious system.

 

This conclusion has significant implications for the study of early Islam. It suggests that what later came to be called “orthodox Islam” emerged not directly from revelation but from the institutionalisation of memory, the process by which oral traditions, political propaganda, and juristic reasoning were attributed retroactively to a prophet figure. By focusing on verifiable evidence, this research contributes to the growing field of Islamic archaeology and critical historiography that seeks to reconstruct Islam’s origins through empirical rather than confessional means.

 

1.4 Structure of the study

The essay proceeds as follows.

Section 2 examines the archaeological and manuscript record, comparing the secure dating of Quranic texts with the absence of early hadith evidence.

Section 3 traces the historiographical development of the hadith through its oral, juristic, and sectarian phases.

Section 4 analyses fabrication techniques and sociopolitical motives, while Section 5 explores theological consequences, especially the creation of Sharia and the mythologising of Muhammad.

 

Section 6 considers the continuing absence of archaeological corroboration, and Section 7 concludes with the implications for understanding Islam’s formative period through material culture.

​

​

Archaeological and Manuscript Context

2.1 The Quran in the archaeological record

Archaeological data confirm that the Quran achieved written form within the first generation after its proclamation.

 

Four manuscript groups anchor the discussion.

1. The Birmingham Fragments (Mingana 1572a).
   Radiocarbon analysis conducted at Oxford (2015) dated the parchment to 568–645 CE with 95 per cent confidence (Thomas 2015). The script, a Hijazi hand, corresponds palaeographically to the earliest Quranic codices. This establishes a terminus ante quem for Quranic textuality within a few decades of the Prophet’s lifetime.

2. The Ṣanʿāʾ Palimpsest (DAM 01-27.1).
   Examined by Sadeghi and Bergmann (2011) and by Déroche (2014), the lower text shows a versional layer distinct from the canonical ʿUthmānic text but clearly Quranic. Radiocarbon dating (95 per cent range 578–669 CE) situates it in the late seventh century. This is direct archaeological proof of a Quranic inscription in the first Islamic century.

3. The Tübingen and Topkapi Codices.
   Both exhibit early Kūfic scripts and parchment dated to 649–675 CE (Déroche 2014). These artefacts collectively demonstrate that Qur’anic writing circulated within two generations of the movement’s inception.

4. Inscriptions and Coinage.
   The Dome of the Rock (691–692 CE) bears lengthy Quranic citations (Quran: chapter 4, verse 171 and chapter 19, verses 33–35) proclaiming monotheism and the messenger’s role, while early Umayyad coins (c. 696 CE) carry the shahāda formula “lā ilāha illā Allāh Muḥammad rasūl Allāh.” These state epigraphs confirm Quranic phraseology in public use before the eighth century.

 

The combined archaeological and palaeographic data give the Quran an unusually solid material foundation for a late-antique scripture.

 

By contrast, no such evidence exists for any hadith text from the same era.

 

2.2 Absence of early hadith manuscripts

The earliest identifiable hadith fragments are Egyptian papyri from Fustat analysed by Nabia Abbott (1939, 1957).

She published several small scraps (University of Chicago Oriental Institute Papyri 408–410) containing phrases such as qāla rasūl Allāh (“the Messenger of God said…”).

On palaeographic grounds, she dated them to the mid-eighth century CE, roughly 120 years after the Quran’s first attested manuscripts. No fragment has been carbon-dated to an earlier period, and all survive in isolated form, without isnād lists or canonical ordering.

 

Later discoveries confirm but do not antedate Abbott’s assessment. Déroche (2014) notes that early papyri in the Bibliothèque Nationale and the Austrian National Library showing hadith formulas belong to the Abbasid chancery hand of the late eighth century. None precedes 750 CE. Likewise, the Mālikī Muwaṭṭaʾ survives only in ninth-century copies; its oldest extant manuscript, Escorial 1828, is dated palaeographically to c. 850 CE (Schoeler 2009).

No archaeological site, inscription, or coin from the seventh century bears a quotation recognisable as a hadith. The material silence is complete.

​

The archaeological gradient is unambiguous: Quranic textuality emerges almost immediately; hadith textuality appears only after the Abbasid revolution (750 CE).

 

2.3 Epigraphic and numismatic comparison

The Dome of the Rock inscription is instructive.

It repeats key Quranic formulas, “God is One… He has no partner”, and names Muḥammad rasūl Allāh once, yet contains no narrative elements resembling hadith. Likewise, early coinage displays only short creedal phrases and Quranic citations (Hoyland 1997).

 

Had the hadith corpus existed in the first century, one would expect epigraphic or numismatic evidence of its slogans or legal dicta; none occurs.

By the late eighth century, however, epigraphy begins to reflect juristic vocabulary, terms such as sunnah, fiqh, and ʿilm, corresponding to the rise of legal schools (Grotzfeld 2000). This shift marks the historical entry of hadith discourse into the public lexicon, coinciding with the earliest physical traces of hadith writing.

 

2.4 Papyrological environment

Egyptian and Syrian papyri from the first Islamic century record administrative Arabic, tax receipts, contracts, and letters, but never prophetic sayings. The corpus edited by Grohmann (1952) and later by Becker and Abbott demonstrates that Arabic literacy was widespread for bureaucratic uses, undermining the notion that hadith could not yet be written.

 

The absence of hadith, therefore, indicates not illiteracy but the non-existence of such material at that time.

By contrast, papyri from the 740s–760s begin to use the technical term ḥadīth to mean “report” or “tradition.” This semantic development corroborates the material dating: the very concept of hadith as a textual genre emerges only in the second Islamic century.

 

2.5 Radiocarbon and palaeographic consistency

All available radiocarbon dates for early Arabic manuscripts confirm a chronological sequence:

• Quran fragments cluster in c. 650–700 CE.

• Administrative papyri proliferate through 700–750 CE.

• Hadith fragments appear post-750 CE.

 

This coherence across independent datasets, radiocarbon, palaeography, and codicology, provides scientific confirmation that hadith writing is a later phenomenon. No counter-example has yet been published in a peer-reviewed venue. Claims of earlier written hadith rely exclusively on later literary testimonies, not on datable artefacts.

 

2.6 Implications of the archaeological silence

From an archaeological standpoint, the absence of evidence does not automatically prove absence. However, in cases where extensive contemporary documentation exists for related activities, such as state inscriptions, Quranic codices, and administrative papyri, the complete absence of hadith references constitutes negative evidence of high probative value (Finster 2011). In historical archaeology, this pattern indicates that the phenomenon in question had not yet been recorded in writing.

 

Therefore, the silence of the first-century archaeological record implies that the hadith were not yet textualised. Oral remembrance may have circulated, but such oral lore leaves no measurable trace and cannot be dated or authenticated. The emergence of hadith literature corresponds instead with the needs of the Abbasid bureaucracy to codify law and theology.

 

2.7 The Quran–Hadith chronological divide

The archaeological and manuscript record thus delineates a clear two-phase development:

1. Qur’anic Phase (650–700 CE): rapid fixation and dissemination of scripture; abundant manuscript and epigraphic evidence; theological focus on divine unity.

2. Hadith Phase (750–900 CE): literary explosion of reports attributed to the Prophet; complete absence of earlier artefacts; proliferation under Abbasid patronage.

 

This chronological divide is crucial. It reveals that the hadith were composed after the Qur’an’s canonisation, not alongside it. They are not co-revelations but retrospective commentaries that sought to extend divine authority into domains the Qur’an left open.

​

Historiographical Development of the Hadith

3.1 Oral beginnings and early community memory

In the decades following the Quran’s codification, Islamic preaching remained primarily oral.

The early believers, or muʾminūn, operated within a shared Semitic milieu that prized recitation and memorisation (Donner 2010). Oral reports concerning the Prophet’s conduct likely circulated informally as moral anecdotes or local precedents rather than as authoritative scripture.

No 7th-century documentary evidence attests to their systematic preservation. Even early administrative papyri, rich in Quranic invocations, are silent regarding prophetic sayings (Grohmann 1952).

Modern historiography interprets this oral phase as one of communal recollection rather than transmission. Reports were fluid, context-bound, and often contradictory, an expected feature of living oral traditions (Vansina 1985). The absence of a fixed textual form allowed each regional community to shape its own prophetic image.

 

As Islam spread across multilingual populations under the Umayyads (661–750 CE), this diversity increased rather than diminished.

 

3.2 The Umayyad context

Under the Umayyad caliphs, the empire required legal and ideological cohesion. Governors issued decrees invoking the sunnah, the “customary practice” of the Prophet, yet the term remained generic and not anchored in a written corpus (Powers 2006).

 

Hadith at this stage functioned as juridical precedent, invoked ad hoc to legitimise political or moral positions. The first attempts to collect such reports appear to have been administrative, not devotional, serving to record provincial rulings or judicial opinions (Grosz 2010).

Historians such as Goldziher (1890) and Schacht (1950) viewed the Umayyad period as one of proto-hadith formation, when competing factions attributed opinions to the Prophet to bolster authority.

 

For example, rival qāḍīs (judges) in Basra and Kufa cited contradictory “sayings” on taxation or warfare, each claiming prophetic endorsement. The growing inflation of reports already troubled contemporaries; Ibn Sīrīn (d. 729 CE) reportedly warned, “They did not use to ask about the chain of transmission until the fitnah [civil war] occurred” (Muslim, Muqaddimah). This remark, preserved in later compilations, reveals that the very concept of isnād authentication emerged only after political fragmentation demanded it.

 

3.3 The Abbasid revolution and textualisation

The Abbasid revolution of 750 CE shifted the locus of power from Damascus to Baghdad and coincided with a cultural explosion in writing. The new dynasty sought religious legitimacy distinct from the discredited Umayyads. Patronage of scholars who could trace doctrine back to the Prophet provided that legitimacy (Hodgson 1974). Within this climate, the oral reports were textualised, converted from fluid memory into a written record.

The earliest named compilation, Mālik ibn Anas’s al-Muwaṭṭaʾ (c. 780 CE), combined juristic opinion with transmitted sayings. Its structure reflects a transitional phase: many entries begin “It reached me that the Messenger of God said,” lacking full isnāds. Mālik’s work thus represents semi-textualised tradition—part oral, part scholastic. Slightly later collections, such as those attributed to ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī (d. 827 CE), introduced systematic isnād chains and thematic organisation.

 

By the mid-ninth century, hadith compilation had become an academic industry. Al-Bukhārī (d. 870 CE) and Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj (d. 875 CE) produced massive anthologies, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, purporting to distinguish authentic from spurious reports through isnād criticism. These works cite hundreds of thousands of transmissions collected across the empire, a scale possible only after two centuries of accumulation. The compilers themselves admitted rejecting the vast majority as unreliable: Bukhārī reportedly preserved 7,000 of 600,000 reports (Brown 2009). The sheer volume indicates fabrication on an industrial scale.

 

3.4 Evolution of the isnād system

The isnād, or chain of narrators, became the hallmark of hadith science.

Schacht (1950) and later Juynboll (1983) demonstrated through common link analysis that many isnāds converge on transmitters active in the early eighth century, not on seventh-century companions.

 

This statistical pattern suggests back-projection: later scholars retrofitted chains to lend antiquity to emerging doctrines.

 

Motzki (1991) proposed a more nuanced chronology, identifying a few proto-hadith clusters traceable to early jurists such as Ibn Shihāb al-Zuhrī (d. 742 CE). Yet even these examples show substantial textual evolution between the first citation and the later canonical form. Thus, while partial cores may predate Abbasid compilation, the majority of isnāds are literary constructs reflecting editorial rationalisation rather than continuous transmission.

From a historiographical perspective, isnād criticism itself is evidence of late textual anxiety: only when forgery became rampant did authenticity require formal methodology (Lucas 2004).

 

The science of ʿilm al-rijāl, biographical evaluation of transmitters, arose to control a problem it could never eliminate.

 

3.5 Sectarian divergence: Sunni and Shia corpora

The Abbasid period also witnessed the consolidation of sectarian identities. Competing claims to legitimate succession after the Prophet produced distinct hadith canons.

• Sunni tradition crystallised around six canonical collections (Kutub al-Sittah): Bukhārī, Muslim, Abū Dāwūd, al-Tirmidhī, al-Nasāʾī, and Ibn Mājah. These emphasised the authority of the Prophet’s companions and validated the caliphal system.

• Shia tradition formed four canonical works (Kutub al-Arbaʿa): al-Kāfī (al-Kulaynī, d. 941 CE), Man lā yaḥḍuruhu al-faqīh, Tahdhīb al-aḥkām, and al-Istibṣār. These prioritised sayings of the Imams descended from ʿAlī and rejected Sunni companions as unreliable.

 

The existence of two incompatible prophetic corpora undermines any claim to uniform historical transmission. Both sides produced hadith affirming their own theological positions, Sunni reports extolling obedience to rulers, and Shia reports asserting divine appointment of the Imams. The duality illustrates how hadith served sectarian legitimisation, not historical memory (Modarressi 1993).

 

3.6 Legal formalisation and the rise of Sharia

Parallel to hadith canonisation was the formation of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Jurists sought divine sanction for rulings not specified in the Qur’an, commercial disputes, inheritance details, and ritual minutiae. They found it in the expanding hadith. Al-Shāfiʿī (d. 820 CE) provided the theoretical framework: in his al-Risāla, he declared the Islamic mythological Prophet’s Sunnah a second revelation equal in authority to the Quran (Calder 1993).

 

This doctrinal move institutionalised hadith as law.

 

Schacht (1950) demonstrated that legal precedents historically traceable to eighth-century jurists were retroactively attributed to the Prophet through fabricated isnāds. Later Muslim jurists accepted these attributions as authentic, transforming scholarly consensus into divine command. Thus, the hadith’s integration into law represents the point at which historical memory solidified into normative authority.

 

3.7 The literary crystallisation

By the tenth century, the hadith genre had reached maturity. Canonical collections were copied widely and commented upon; compilers like al-Bayhaqī (d. 1066 CE) and Ibn Ḥanbal (d. 855 CE) expanded the corpus. Distinctions emerged between ṣaḥīḥ (sound), ḥasan (good), and ḍaʿīf (weak) reports, codifying a quasi-scientific taxonomy. Yet the criteria remained internal and circular: authenticity depended on narrator's reputation as defined by the same tradition it sought to verify.

 

From a historiographical viewpoint, this period marks the closure of the hadith canon. Thereafter, Muslim intellectual life revolved around commentary, not creation. The dynamic process of fabrication had ended because the product, an authoritative prophetic corpus, had achieved political and theological equilibrium.

 

3.8 Modern historiographical assessment

Nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholars pioneered critical methods for dating hadith. Ignaz Goldziher (1890) first argued that hadith mirror the opinions of the second and third Islamic centuries rather than those of the Prophet. Joseph Schacht (1950) extended this by demonstrating that legal hadith originate as back-projections of later juristic practice. G.H.A. Juynboll (1983) refined the method statistically, mapping isnād networks to reveal centres of origination. Harald Motzki (1991) offered a limited corrective, suggesting that some textual kernels may reflect earlier oral strata, but he too concluded that canonical forms are Abbasid.

 

Subsequent studies, Crone and Cook (1977), Wansbrough (1977), Donner (2010), and Sinai (2017), corroborate this overall framework: hadith literature reflects the doctrinal and administrative consolidation of Islam between 750 and 900 CE.

 

None of these works identifies archaeological or manuscript evidence earlier than the eighth century.

 

3.9 Inter-religious parallels

Historiographically, the hadith phenomenon parallels scriptural expansions in other late-antique religions. Jewish rabbis produced midrash to elaborate Mosaic law; early Christians composed apocryphal gospels to fill gaps left by canonical texts. In both cases, oral lore was textualised centuries later to meet new communal needs (VanderKam 2001). The Islamic hadith belong to this same cultural pattern of post-scriptural elaboration: human attempts to anchor evolving practice in sacred antiquity.

 

​

The Fabrication Process and Sociopolitical Drivers – Part 1

4.1 Introduction

Having established the chronological emergence of the hadith, it becomes necessary to analyse the mechanisms through which they were produced. The process was neither random nor purely devotional; it reflected concrete political, legal, and theological needs of the expanding empire. From the perspective of historiography, the hadith represent a deliberate literary construction, a body of invented precedent retroactively projected onto an imagined prophetic past (Schacht 1950; Goldziher 1890).

 

4.2 Techniques of fabrication

4.2.1 Invented isnāds

The cornerstone of hadith authority is the isnād, the chain of narrators linking a report to the Prophet. Yet statistical studies of isnād networks show that most chains converge on transmitters active more than a century after Muhammad’s supposed death (Juynboll 1983; Motzki 1991). This pattern indicates back-projection: later scholars created pseudo-genealogies of transmission to legitimise their opinions. Once the isnād became a criterion of authenticity in the mid-eighth century, fabricators generated longer and more plausible chains, a phenomenon Lucas (2004) calls “the inflation of authority.”

 

4.2.2 Pious forgery

Another widespread technique was al-kadhib li’l-targhīb wa’l-tarhīb, forgery “for a good cause.” Early collectors openly admitted inventing sayings to promote virtue or discourage sin (Brown 2009). Narrators justified fabrication by claiming good intentions; the moral didacticism of many hadith reflects this genre. For instance, countless reports promising exaggerated rewards for minor pious acts, smiling, fasting on particular days, and reciting short prayers, bear the stylistic hallmarks of this didactic motive.

 

4.2.3 Attribution through association

Local jurists and storytellers often attached their own rulings to the Prophet by association. As Schacht (1950, p. 168) demonstrated, the legal doctrine can frequently be traced backwards from later jurists to regional authorities and only then to Muhammad. The Prophet’s authority thus served as a rhetorical anchor for evolving legal practice rather than its historical source.

 

4.3 Political patronage and legitimisation

4.3.1 Umayyad precedent

During the Umayyad era, rulers sought religious justification for their policies. Hadith praising obedience to the ruler, such as “Hear and obey, even if he strikes your back and takes your wealth”, appear in later collections (Bukhārī Book 93). These sayings conveniently legitimised the monarchy at a time when opposition movements invoked Qur’anic ideals of justice. Their appearance after the political need they satisfy is strong evidence of retrospective fabrication (Crone 1980).

 

4.3.2 Abbasid codification

After 750 CE, the Abbasids institutionalised hadith production on a vast scale. Court-sponsored scholars such as Ibn Ḥanbal and al-Bukhārī operated within a culture that rewarded textual proof of prophetic endorsement. The caliph al-Maʾmūn’s promotion of religious scholarship through the Bayt al-Ḥikmah created what Gleave (2012) terms “a bureaucratisation of piety.” Under these conditions, forging authoritative reports became a mechanism of both political compliance and academic advancement.

The Abbasid state’s need for a unifying orthodoxy explains the sudden proliferation of compilations between 780 and 870 CE, the period when Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī, Muslim, and the four Shia kutub were assembled. Each collection endorsed the legitimacy of its patrons’ theological positions.

 

4.4 Socio-legal motives

Beyond political control, the hadith addressed juristic gaps left by the Qur’an. The scripture provided moral guidance but little procedural law. Emerging schools of jurisprudence, the Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Shāfiʿī, and Ḥanbalī, sought prophetic precedent for new rulings on inheritance, trade, and ritual. Competing scholars produced conflicting reports supporting their own positions. When one legal opinion gained traction, a corresponding hadith was soon “found” to support it (Schacht 1950, p. 31).

This dynamic created what Burton (1994) calls “a feedback loop of legislation and narration”: juristic innovations generated hadith; those hadith in turn justified further legal expansion. The Prophet thus became a fictional legislator supplying endless authority for every conceivable case.

​

The Fabrication Process and Sociopolitical Drivers – Part 2

4.5 Sectarian competition and theological invention

The political divisions that crystallised after the first civil wars (656–661 CE) created fertile ground for competing narratives. Every faction generated hadith to validate its legitimacy.

• Shia movements produced reports asserting that the Prophet explicitly appointed ʿAlī as his successor, e.g. the hadith of Ghadīr Khumm—while condemning the first three caliphs.

• Sunni circles responded with traditions extolling the virtues of the same caliphs and denouncing rebellion against authority.

• Kharijites circulated reports praising piety over lineage, while Murjiʾites crafted sayings emphasising faith over works.

Goldziher (1890, vol. 2, p. 112) noted that “every theological idea and political tendency of the early centuries sought and found expression in the form of a hadith.” This mass production of prophecy-for-the-cause blurred the boundary between scripture and propaganda. By the Abbasid period, sectarian polemic had swollen the corpus to hundreds of thousands of conflicting reports.

 

4.6 Moral, ascetic, and superstitious motives

Not all fabricators pursued power. Many acted from what they considered pious motives. Preachers and ascetics composed sayings to promote moral behaviour, promising extravagant heavenly rewards or terrifying punishments. For example, numerous weak hadith promise paradise for specific devotional acts, visiting certain mosques, reciting particular prayers, or fasting on specified days, none of which has a Qur’anic basis. Brown (2009) characterises this as “the moralisation of fabrication”: storytellers sought to motivate illiterate audiences through imaginative eschatology.

Other reports reflect popular superstition rather than theology. Hadith about the medicinal value of black seed, camel urine, or certain stones illustrate how folk remedies entered sacred narrative (Abbott 1957). The line between folklore and revelation became indistinct once every local custom could be sanctified by the phrase qāla rasūl Allāh, “the Messenger of God said.”

 

4.7 Scholarly acknowledgement of forgery

Ironically, early Muslim scholars themselves recognised the epidemic of fabrication. Ibn Sīrīn, al-Zuhri, and later Ibn ʿAdī compiled lists of known liars. Ibn al-Jawzī’s al-Mawḍūʿāt (twelfth century) catalogues hundreds of fabricated traditions still circulating in his day. Al-Bukhārī and Muslim admitted rejecting the vast majority of reports they encountered. The ḥadīth-critic Ibn Ḥibbān (d. 965) lamented that “lies multiplied about the Prophet until they filled the land.”

Despite this awareness, the problem proved structural: the mechanisms of authentication were internal to the same tradition that produced the forgeries. A narrator’s “reliability” rested on earlier scholars’ opinions, an inherently circular standard (Cook 1983). The system produced the appearance of scientific verification while preserving its own assumptions of authority.

 

4.8 Quantitative indicators of invention

Modern statistical studies strengthen the classical critics’ intuition. Juynboll’s (1983) common-link analysis reveals that most isnād networks converge not on seventh-century companions but on eighth-century transmitters, the earliest point of textual crystallisation. When a single narrator becomes the common origin of multiple chains, historians infer that the report was invented in that narrator’s milieu. Motzki’s (1991) re-analysis of legal hadith corroborated this pattern: roughly 90 per cent originate no earlier than 720–750 CE. The remaining 10 per cent show gradual elaboration rather than verbatim preservation.

Such quantitative mapping transforms the charge of fabrication from moral accusation to measurable historical process. It demonstrates that hadith proliferation followed the diffusion curves of other literary genres, with rapid exponential growth until canonisation around 900 CE.

 

4.9 The fabrication-criticism paradox

The coexistence of forgery and verification created what Wansbrough (1977, p. 85) termed “the criticism paradox.” The very effort to purify the corpus through isnād scrutiny confirmed its human origin. Once the science of hadith emerged, the tradition ceased to be remembered and became literature. The abundance of fabricated material forced scholars to define authenticity through increasingly technical criteria, transforming oral legend into textual scholarship. The result was a canon of controlled invention, a closed system in which authenticity meant conformity to later scholastic norms rather than correspondence with seventh-century events.

​

Theological and Doctrinal Consequences

5.1 From moral monotheism to institutional theology

The Qur’an’s theology is sparse, abstract, and ethical: it speaks of a single unseen Creator, calls for moral responsibility, and rejects intermediaries (Quran: chapter 6, verse 164; chapter 42, verse 11). When the hadith literature appeared in the eighth–ninth centuries CE, this minimalism gave way to a detailed dogmatic system. Through thousands of reports, scholars constructed an entire cosmology, including angels, hierarchies, eschatological scenes, and minute ritual prescriptions. The transformation parallels the movement from prophetic monotheism to scholastic religion in other late-antique faiths (Crone 2004; Donner 2010).

 

This change was not simply devotional expansion. It reflected the new empire’s need for institutional cohesion. By assigning divine authority to the Prophet’s alleged sayings, jurists created a framework of orthodoxy capable of regulating belief and practice across a vast, culturally diverse domain (Hallaq 2005).

 

5.2 Creation of Sharia as post-Qur’ānic law

As shown in Section 3, the Qur’an provides at most eighty verses with legal content, largely moral principles, not codified statutes. The hadith filled this vacuum by transforming flexible ethics into enforceable law. Legal scholars in Kufa, Medina, and later Baghdad used prophetic reports to settle questions of inheritance, marriage, trade, and punishment that the Qur’an left open (Burton 1994).

 

5.3 Anthropomorphism and the re-shaping of God

The Qur’an insists that God is incomparable and beyond vision (Quran: chapter 6, verse 103; chapter 42, verse 11).

 

Many canonical hadith, however, portray Him in vividly human terms:

• God “descends to the lowest heaven each night” (Bukhārī 1145).

• God “laughs” and “shows His leg” on Judgement Day (Bukhārī 4919).

• God “places His foot in Hell and it contracts” (Muslim 2846).

 

Such imagery reintroduces anthropomorphic theism reminiscent of pre-Islamic and biblical motifs. Classical theologians debated how literally to read these statements. The Ahl al-Hadīth affirmed the descriptions bi-lā kayf (“without asking how”), while rationalists such as the Muʿtazila rejected them as incompatible with divine transcendence (Watt 1973). The victory of the traditionalists under the Abbasids ensured that anthropomorphic language remained within orthodox theology, marking a decisive departure from the Qur’an’s philosophical monotheism.

 

5.4 The mythologising of the Prophet

The Qur’an depicts Muhammad as a mortal messenger, “a man like yourselves” (Quran: chapter 18, verse 110).

In hadith and later sīra, he becomes superhuman: sinless, miracle-working, even pre-existent. Stories of the moon splitting, trees saluting him, and water flowing from his fingers abound (Bukhārī 4850; Muslim 2277). Ninth- and tenth-century mystical writings further describe him as the Nūr Muḥammadī, the first light of creation (al-Bayhaqī n.d.).

This development parallels the apotheosis of founders in other religions. As Crone (2004) notes, “The Prophet of the Qur’an is scarcely recognisable in the Prophet of tradition.” The shift from messenger to cosmic mediator provided an emotional focus for devotion and a theological justification for intercession, both absent from the Qur’an (Quran: chapter 39, verse 44).

 

5.5 Predestination and the erosion of moral responsibility

Qur’anic ethics hinge on free will: “God does not change the condition of a people until they change what is within themselves.” (Quran: chapter 13, verse 11) In contrast, numerous hadith teach that all actions are pre-written:

 

“God created Adam and touched his back, bringing forth his descendants, assigning some to Paradise and some to Hell.” (Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Musnad 2784)

Such determinism underpinned the Ashʿarite theology of the ninth century, where divine omnipotence eclipsed human agency. The resulting fatalism justified political passivity and social hierarchy; if everything is decreed, resistance to tyranny becomes impiety (Weiss 1992). The moral dynamic of the Qur’an thus yielded to a metaphysical one that served imperial stability.

 

5.6 Sectarian codification of belief

Because each political faction generated its own hadith corpus, theology became sect-specific.

• Sunni compilers stressed divine transcendence and prophetic infallibility, embedding obedience to rulers in faith itself.

• Shia collections introduced the Imamate: the belief that divine knowledge resides in the Prophet’s family, especially ʿAlī and the Twelve Imams.

• Sufi literature, blending hadith and mysticism, developed the idea of the Prophet’s metaphysical light as an emanation of God.

 

All three strands rely on post-Qur’anic hadith attributions.

The result was the fragmentation of Islam into theological systems often mutually exclusive, contradicting the Qur’an’s injunction against sectarianism (Quran: chapter 23, verses 52–53).

Donner (2010) interprets this pluralisation as evidence that “the hadith crystallised diverse regional Islams into self-contained orthodoxy.”

 

5.7 The rise of clerical authority

The Qur’an addresses its audience directly: “This Book is guidance for mankind” (Quran: chapter 2, verse 185).

By contrast, the hadith created a need for mediators, scholars qualified to judge authenticity and interpret prophetic precedent.

The ʿulamāʾ thereby assumed quasi-priestly authority within a religion that had initially rejected priesthood (Hodgson 1974).

Mastery of hadith became the gateway to legal and political power. The Prophet’s putative words, once oral anecdotes, became a bureaucratic instrument of governance and social control.

​

Archaeological Silence and Historical Probability

6.1 The empirical landscape

After more than a century of scientific excavation across the Middle East, Arabia, and North Africa, archaeology has produced abundant data for the Qurʾānic period but no direct evidence corroborating the hadith narratives. Mosques, inscriptions, coins, and papyri document the expansion of early Islam, yet they reveal nothing of the detailed biographical and legal material that fills the ninth-century compilations. Sites extensively excavated, Mecca, Medina, Fustat, Kufa, Basra, Damascus, Jerusalem, yield administrative and architectural remains consistent with an emerging state, not with the detailed personal stories later attached to the Prophet or his companions (Hoyland 1997; Finster 2011).

 

The absence covers every material category:

• Inscriptions: Hundreds of Arabic inscriptions dated 640–700 CE record Qurʾānic phrases or simple professions of faith, but not prophetic sayings or references to hadith topics.

• Numismatics: Umayyad and early Abbasid coin series carry pious slogans, lā ilāha illā Allāh waḥdahu, and occasional Qurʾānic snippets (Q 9:33), but never hadith.

• Papyri: Tens of thousands of administrative documents list taxes, land transfers, and personal names, yet none cite a prophetic report.

• Architecture: The Dome of the Rock (691–692 CE) and other monuments embed Qurʾānic verses, not sayings or biographical scenes.

 

If the hadith corpus had existed in any written or liturgical form during the seventh century, some reflection of its language would likely appear in these media. Its complete absence, therefore, constitutes a significant datum in itself.

 

6.2 Methodological value of absence

Historians distinguish between ordinary and systematic absence. Ordinary absence results from poor preservation; systematic absence occurs when contemporary records of comparable phenomena exist yet omit the item under study. The hadith belong to the latter category. Because seventh-century Arabia and its provinces produced abundant inscribed and written artefacts, their silence about hadith is positive evidence that such literature had not yet emerged (Finster 2011).

In archaeological reasoning, this is akin to the argument from expected trace: when comparable activities, administration, trade, or religion, leave material residues but the target phenomenon does not, the most economical explanation is non-existence at that time. The conclusion is strengthened by the fact that hadith subjects, battles, treaties, companions, would, if historical, have generated datable artefacts: tombs, dedicatory inscriptions, correspondence, or battlefield debris. None has been identified.

 

6.3 Corroboration from non-Islamic sources

Contemporaneous Christian, Syriac, and Armenian chronicles provide an external control. Texts such as the Doctrina Jacobi (c. 640 CE), the Armenian Chronicle of Sebeos (c. 660 CE), and the Maronite Chronicle (c. 664 CE) mention Arab conquests and a prophetic figure, yet they do not recount the detailed episodes found in later hadith, no Night Journey, no battles of Badr or Uhud, no succession disputes framed in Islamic terminology. These authors knew of a monotheistic movement centred on scripture, not of a complex prophetic biography (Crone and Cook 1977; Hoyland 1997). The contrast reinforces the view that the hadith narratives were internal literary constructions of the following centuries.

 

6.4 Absence of seventh-century artefacts linked to companions

The hadith names hundreds of companions, wives, and enemies of the Prophet, yet archaeology has uncovered no authenticated graves, inscriptions, or belongings attributable to any of them. Burial sites in Medina and elsewhere were identified only centuries later by tradition, without stratigraphic or epigraphic confirmation (Petersen 2017). When relics are claimed, such as the Prophet’s sandals or hair, they appear in Ottoman-era contexts, not in early Islamic strata. The pattern mirrors the development of saint cults in late antiquity: relics emerge when veneration requires physical anchors, not when the individuals actually lived.

 

6.5 Environmental archaeology and settlement evidence

Regional surveys across the Hijaz show a modest pattern of urban growth in the late seventh century, expansion of Medina’s oasis, foundation of garrison towns in Iraq and Syria, but no traces of the large-scale battles, fortifications, or migrations described in hadith literature (King 2008). The material record corresponds to a gradual bureaucratic consolidation rather than to the dramatic conquest narratives retroactively woven into prophetic biography.

Environmental archaeology thus supports the textual chronology: social change preceded, and likely inspired, the stories later framed as the Prophet’s campaigns or miracles.

 

6.6 Codicology and material culture of the hadith manuscripts

When hadith finally appeared in physical form in the late eighth century, their material characteristics differed from Qurʾānic codices. Early Qurʾāns use parchment and angular Kūfic script suited for liturgy; hadith manuscripts appear on papyrus and early paper, written in cursive Abbasid hands (Déroche 2014). This distinction confirms a later origin. Paper itself was introduced from Central Asia to the Islamic world around 750 CE (Bloom 2001). The earliest complete hadith compilations could not therefore predate that technological diffusion. The very medium of transmission, paper, belongs to the Abbasid, not the Umayyad, world.

 

6.7 Probability modelling

Historical probability can be approached through Bayesian reasoning: given the presence of abundant seventh-century textual artefacts (Qurʾāns, papyri, inscriptions) and the total absence of hadith parallels, the posterior probability that hadith texts existed then but left no trace is exceedingly low. Every additional discovery of early Qurʾānic material without accompanying hadith pushes that probability lower. The cumulative data set from excavations and libraries now encompasses over two thousand datable Arabic manuscripts; none are hadith (Déroche 2014). Statistically, the hadith’s appearance only after 750 CE is the most parsimonious model.

 

6.8 Comparative historiography

The pattern observed in Islam has analogues in other scriptural traditions. Jewish midrash and Christian apocrypha likewise lack early archaeological attestation; their artefactual trails begin centuries after the canonical texts they elaborate (VanderKam 2001). In each case, literary expansion accompanied institutional consolidation. The hadith’s late emergence, therefore, fits a recognised historical model: post-revelatory communities create explanatory literature to regulate doctrine and ritual once the founding charisma has faded.

 

6.9 Consequences for reconstructing early Islam

The archaeological silence of the hadith period has two interpretive consequences:

1. Chronological constraint: The earliest datable hadith manuscripts, appearing with the advent of paper technology, set a firm terminus post quem around 750 CE for textualisation.

2. Historical limitation: Events, persons, and places described solely in hadith cannot be treated as historical without independent corroboration. They belong to the realm of historiography and memory, not empirical history.

This does not preclude the existence of a historical preacher or early community; it simply means that the hadith are not primary evidence for that era. They are artefacts of later remembrance shaped by the needs of the Abbasid state and its scholars.

​

Conclusion

7.1 Synthesis of evidence

This investigation set out to determine what archaeology, manuscript studies, and historiography can reliably tell us about the origins of the Islamic hadith. The evidence, considered across independent disciplines, converges on one coherent picture.

1. Chronology: Radiocarbon-dated Qurʾānic manuscripts—from the Ṣanʿāʾ palimpsest, Birmingham folios, Tübingen and Topkapi codices—place the Qurʾān’s textualisation securely within the mid-seventh century CE. No comparable material evidence exists for any hadith before the mid-eighth century.

2. Manuscript record: The earliest identifiable hadith fragments—the Fustat papyri published by Abbott (1939, 1957)—are palaeographically dated to c. 760–780 CE. Complete compilations, such as Mālik’s Muwaṭṭaʾ and the Ṣaḥīḥ collections of Bukhārī and Muslim, appear between 780 and 870 CE. This gap of more than a century between Qurʾānic and hadith textualisation is supported by codicological, palaeographic, and technological data: the transition from parchment to paper coincides with the appearance of hadith literature.

3. Archaeological context: Inscriptions, coins, and papyri of the seventh century employ Qurʾānic language and formulae but contain no trace of hadith phraseology or reference. Excavated sites and environmental surveys reveal administrative expansion, not the detailed events later narrated in hadith.

4. Historiography: Scholars from Goldziher (1890) to Donner (2010) agree that the hadith corpus reflects the concerns of the second and third Islamic centuries. Statistical mapping of isnād networks shows clustering around transmitters active after 720 CE (Juynboll 1983; Motzki 1991). The “Prophetic” material therefore mirrors the social, legal, and sectarian debates of the Abbasid era rather than preserving the voice of a seventh-century individual.

The cumulative result is decisive: the hadith are post-Qurʾānic compositions, literary artefacts of an empire seeking theological and legal unity. They cannot be treated as eyewitness documentation of early Islam in the same way that the Qurʾān can be treated as a seventh-century text.

 

7.2 From revelation to institution

Material and historiographical data reveal a two-stage evolution:

1. Revelatory phase (c. 630–700 CE).
   A monotheistic scripture—the Qurʾān—circulates and becomes fixed in writing. Its theology is universal and ethically oriented, lacking detailed ritual or legal codification.

2. Institutional phase (c. 750–900 CE).
   As the Abbasid empire consolidates, jurists and theologians systematise oral lore into hadith to justify governance, law, and sectarian identity. The Prophet’s remembered persona becomes the axis of orthodoxy; his alleged words supply legislation for every sphere of life.

The transformation parallels comparable transitions in Judaism and Christianity, where oral interpretation and apocryphal literature emerged once communities required institutional frameworks. In each case, post-scriptural writings retrospectively sanctified evolving norms. The hadith thus represent the institutionalisation of charisma—the conversion of an inspired movement into a regulated religion.

 

7.3 Implications for theology and history

7.3.1 Re-evaluation of historical sources

The contrast between archaeological silence and literary abundance obliges historians to rank sources by evidentiary weight. Qurʾānic manuscripts, inscriptions, and early administrative documents are primary data. Hadith collections, compiled centuries later without physical antecedents, are secondary constructions. Consequently, reconstructions of early Islam should prioritise the material and contemporaneous record rather than retrospective narration.

 

7.3.2 Theological implications

Theologically, the findings delineate the boundary between revelation and commentary. The Qurʾān presents itself as complete and self-contained (Q 6:38; 16:89); the hadith expand it through human reasoning and sectarian imagination. The historical process of fabrication documented by both classical and modern scholars shows that these expansions were not divinely mandated but socio-politically conditioned. Recognising this distinction allows a critical yet respectful understanding of Islam as a historical phenomenon evolving through its texts.

 

7.4 The function of fabrication

The study demonstrates that fabrication was not merely deceit but a creative response to historical pressures. Each category of forged tradition fulfilled a specific social function:

• Political – to legitimise rulers or opposition.

• Legal – to fill gaps in Qurʾānic legislation.

• Sectarian – to define group identity.

• Moral – to instruct and inspire the faithful.

The mechanism of fabrication—whether invented isnāds or moral allegories—allowed the community to project its ideals backward onto its founder. From a sociological viewpoint, the hadith were tools for meaning-making, not records of revelation. Their endurance reflects narrative utility, not historical authenticity.

 

7.5 Archaeology as corrective

Archaeology’s neutrality provides the corrective lens through which literary traditions can be tested. By anchoring inquiry in datable artefacts—parchments, inscriptions, coins—it exposes the anachronisms of later sources. The pattern observed in Islamic material culture fits the model of retroactive textual construction: the physical record shows a simple, inscriptionally sparse monotheism evolving into a literate, legalistic religion. No excavation or artefact has yet contradicted this chronology. Future discoveries will refine, not reverse, it.

 

7.6 Future research directions

1. Digital codicology: High-resolution imaging and spectral analysis of palimpsests may reveal erased pre-canonical texts, providing insight into early Qurʾānic and proto-hadith transmission.

2. Bayesian chronology: Integrating radiocarbon data from multiple manuscripts can quantify the temporal gap between Qurʾān and hadith more precisely.

3. Regional archaeology: Systematic excavation of Hijazi sites could test traditional claims about Medina’s early layout and the presence of companions.

4. Comparative textual studies: Cross-cultural analysis with Jewish and Christian late-antique traditions may further clarify the dynamics of post-revelatory literature.

Such approaches continue the empirical shift away from apologetic historiography toward evidence-based reconstruction.

 

7.7 Final assessment

When all lines of evidence—archaeological, palaeographic, statistical, and historiographical—are integrated, a consistent narrative emerges:

• The Qurʾān belongs to the seventh century and is attested materially within that era.

• The hadith arise only after the mid-eighth century, contemporaneous with Abbasid administrative and theological consolidation.

• Their contents mirror the intellectual and political environment of that period, not the life of a seventh-century prophet.

 

Therefore, the hadith cannot function as historical testimony to Islam’s origins. They are a literary monument to the empire’s search for legitimacy, valuable for understanding Abbasid civilisation but unreliable as records of revelation.

Recognising this distinction reframes the study of early Islam within the same critical standards applied to other ancient religions: faith traditions are historical processes, and their texts are artefacts shaped by human hands.

​

References

Abbott, N. (1939) The Rise of the North Arabic Script and Its Kur’ānic Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Abbott, N. (1957) Studies in Arabic Literary Papyri, Vol. 1: Historical Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

al-Bayhaqī, A. (n.d.) Dalāʾil al-nubuwwah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Bloom, J. M. (2001) Paper before Print: The History and Impact of Paper in the Islamic World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Brown, J. (2009) Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld.

Burton, J. (1994) An Introduction to the Hadith. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Calder, N. (1993) ‘Shafi‘i’s al-Risāla: A Reconsideration’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 113 (3), pp. 317–323.

Cook, M. (1983) Early Muslim Dogma: A Source-Critical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crone, P. (1980) Slaves on Horses: The Evolution of the Islamic Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crone, P. (2004) God’s Rule: Government and Islam. New York: Columbia University Press.

Crone, P. and Cook, M. (1977) Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Déroche, F. (2014) The Abbasid Tradition: Qurʾans of the 8th to the 10th Centuries AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Donner, F. M. (2010) Muhammad and the Believers: At the Origins of Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Finster, B. (2011) ‘Archaeological Research on the Early Islamic Period: An Overview’, Der Islam, 86 (1), pp. 1–38.

Gleave, R. (2012) Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Goldziher, I. (1890) Muhammedanische Studien, 2 vols. Halle: Niemeyer.

Grohmann, A. (1952) Arabische Papyri aus den Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Grotzfeld, H. (2000) ‘Sunnah and Hadith in Early Islamic Epigraphy’, in Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Orientalists. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 245–259.

Hallaq, W. B. (2005) The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974) The Venture of Islam, Vol. 1: The Classical Age of Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hoyland, R. G. (1997) Seeing Islam as Others Saw It: A Survey and Evaluation of Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrian Writings on Early Islam. Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press.

Juynboll, G. H. A. (1983) Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chronology, Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

King, G. R. D. (2008) ‘The Archaeology of the Early Islamic Hijaz’, in Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 38, pp. 255–268.

Lucas, S. (2004) Constructive Critics, Hadith Literature, and the Articulation of Sunni Islam. Leiden: Brill.

Modarressi, H. (1993) Crisis and Consolidation in the Formative Period of Shiʿite Islam. Princeton, NJ: Darwin Press.

Motzki, H. (1991) ‘The Musannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Century A.H.’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 50 (1), pp. 1–21.

Petersen, A. (2017) The Archaeology of Death and Burial in the Islamic World. Oxford: Archaeopress.

Powers, D. S. (2006) Law, Society and Culture in the Maghrib, 1300–1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sadeghi, B. and Bergmann, U. (2011) ‘The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qur’an of the Prophet’, Arabica, 58 (4–5), pp. 343–436.

Schacht, J. (1950) The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Schoeler, G. (2009) The Oral and the Written in Early Islam. London: Routledge.

Sinai, N. (2017) The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Thomas, K. (2015) ‘Radiocarbon Dating of the Birmingham Qur’an Fragments’, University of Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit Report, June 2015.

VanderKam, J. C. (2001) An Introduction to Early Judaism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Vansina, J. (1985) Oral Tradition as History. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Wansbrough, J. (1977) Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Watt, W. M. (1973) Islamic Philosophy and Theology: An Extended Survey. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Weiss, B. (1992) The Search for God’s Law: Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf al-Din al-Amidi. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.